WASHINGTON — As the House of Representatives
considers legislation to permanently extend all provisions of last year’s tax
bill beyond their scheduled 2010 expiration date, including rate reductions not
even scheduled to take effect until 2004 and 2006, The Concord Coalition said
today that such action was premature in the absence of a broader agreement
between Congress and the Bush administration to balance the budget again without

WASHINGTON — As the House of Representatives
considers legislation to permanently extend all provisions of last year’s tax
bill beyond their scheduled 2010 expiration date, including rate reductions not
even scheduled to take effect until 2004 and 2006, The Concord Coalition said
today that such action was premature in the absence of a broader agreement
between Congress and the Bush administration to balance the budget again without
tapping into the Social Security surplus.

“Before voting to permanently extend the entire series of escalating tax cuts
approved last year, House Members should ask themselves whether they would have
voted for the full $1.3 trillion package in the first place had they known then
what they know now. If the answer is ‘no,’ then they should not compound the
problem by making the entire package permanent,” said Robert Bixby, Executive
Director of the Concord Coalition.

“Last year’s tax bill was approved on the
assumptions that it would not cause a breach of the Social Security surplus,
that the nation would not be at war, and that even with a $1.3 trillion tax cut
the public debt would be virtually eliminated by the end of the decade — before
the Baby Boomers’ retirement and health care benefits become a major drain on
the budget. It is now clear that all of those assumptions were wrong. A logical
response to such dramatically changed circumstances would be to reassess whether
or not the entire tax cut plan should be phased in over the next several years
as scheduled. But the House bill moves aggressively in the opposite direction by
removing the sunset provision at a 10-year cost of almost $400 billion despite
the fact that the fiscal outlook is much worse than it was when the tax bill was
passed last year,” Bixby said.

That was then — this is now

• Last year, the President’s budget projected non-Social
  Security surpluses for every year. This year, the opposite is true. There is
  no year in which a non-Social Security surplus is projected.

• Last year’s CBO baseline projected a 10-year non-Social
  Security surplus of $3.1 trillion. This year’s most recent CBO
  baseline, which does not include the economic stimulus bill passed in March,
  projects a non-Social Security deficit of $590 billion over the
  same 10 years (2002-2011). And even this assumes that discretionary spending
  growth will slow from more than 7 percent annually in recent years to below 3
  percent.

• Last year the President’s budget projected that even with
  enactment of his recommended tax cut there would be a 10-year budget surplus
  of $3.4 trillion — enough to virtually eliminate the debt held by the public.
  This year’s budget, assuming enactment of the President’s policies, projects a
  surplus of just $665 billion over the same 10-year timeframe.

• Last year’s January CBO baseline projected that the
  statutory debt limit would not be reached until 2009. This year, the debt
  limit has essentially been reached.

• Since last January’s CBO
  baseline, projected net interest payments over the 2002-2011 period have gone
  up by $1 trillion, from $620 billion to $1.6 trillion — roughly $10,000 per
  American household or $1,000 per household per year.

• Even a fiscally responsible
  response to the new security environment will result in substantially higher
  spending than was anticipated last year. In the wake of the September 11
  attacks, the President’s budget appropriately states, “Achieving our homeland
  security objectives will require vast sums of money, strenuous labor and many
  years.” Defense and homeland security proposals have already added about $650
  billion of new expenses to the President’s budget over the next 10 years and
  more is promised.

• One major item on the fiscal agenda has not
  changed. The unfunded obligations of Social Security and Medicare are still
  unfunded. These costs will begin to impact the budget in 2008 when the first
  Baby Boomers qualify for Social Security retirement benefits. Boomers will
  begin to qualify for Medicare in 2011. It will take nearly $9 trillion in
  today’s dollars just to cover the cash shortfalls in Social Security and
  Medicare Part A between 2016 and 2040 — to say nothing of the 75 percent
  general revenue contribution to the rapidly rising costs of Medicare Part B.

“It is important to recognize that last year’s tax bill has
locked us into a smaller stream of revenue at the same time that spending has
escalated sharply due to resurging health care costs and increased national
security needs at home and abroad. This dynamic reverses the trend of the 1990s
in which rising revenues, lower defense spending and modest health care costs
produced declining deficits and eventually four consecutive surpluses, two of
which (1999 and 2000) were big enough to preserve the entire Social Security
surplus. The result of this reversed dynamic is likely to be larger deficits
and, if they occur at all, smaller surpluses than official projections indicate.

 “The proponents of removing the tax cut sunset are correct
that the absurd results of this provision must be dealt with at some point. No
one believes that the tax code will, or should, suddenly revert to its 2001
status on midnight December 31, 2010. But the sunset provision serves a very
useful purpose — it is the ultimate ‘trigger.’ As events unfold over the next
year or two, and we see whether deficits are as short term and modest as the
President hopes, it may make sense to adjust the phase-in of tax cuts
accordingly — perhaps extending some of them permanently while limiting or
delaying the effect of others. With deficits back, the Boomers scheduled to
begin receiving entitlement benefits in just six years and the upper level of
future spending on national security still very uncertain, what is needed more
than extended tax cuts is a new long-term fiscal policy plan. In the absence of
any such plan it is likely that Congress and the President will continue
spending the Social Security surplus indefinitely — in effect, wasting the
opportunity to use this resource for needed national savings. Removing the tax
cut sunset should only be done after some much more difficult choices have been
made,” said Bixby.

The Concord Coalition is a nonpartisan, grass
roots organization dedicated to balanced federal budgets and generationally
responsible fiscal policy.  Former U.S. Senators Warren Rudman (R-NH) and Bob
Kerrey (D-NE) serve as Concord’s co-chairs and former Secretary of Commerce
Peter Peterson serves as president.

Share this page