As Congress slides into April without any serious progress on a budget resolution in the House, some pragmatic lawmakers are reportedly considering the use of a novel approach to break the gridlock: a “Queen of the Hill” legislative rule.
The rule operates on a simple, common-sense principle: Every lawmaker has an opportunity to put his or her preferred solution on the table, and if no preferred solution receives a majority of votes, a default option is “deemed,” or considered passed by the House. This approach should be taken seriously and the lawmakers proposing it should be praised for their efforts.
At issue in the impasse over the budget resolution is the $1.07 trillion total for Fiscal Year 2017 appropriations agreed to by lawmakers in the Fall. Some argue that the figure is too high; if the budget were accompanied by reforms to mandatory spending to put long-term deficits on a downward trajectory, they say, the agreement reached might be more acceptable. Laudable as this goal may seem, it has had the adverse effect of blockading the budget process.
It is against this backdrop that Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Penn.) has raised the possibility of a “Queen of the Hill” rule to inject some needed creativity into a broken process. Dent, according to a report in the National...