|President Opens Door to Taxing Health Benefits||Obama Emphasizes Importance of Controlling Health Care Costs||War Costs Nearing Trillion Dollar Mark||Supplemental Held up by IMF and War Policy Concerns||Appropriations Tracker|
Welcome to the Concord Coalition's weekly Washington Budget Report: a nonpartisan plain English summary of key budget, appropriations, and tax developments.
The Concord Coalition Washington Budget Report is written and edited by Charles Konigsberg, Chief Budget Counsel of The Concord Coalition. If you have questions or comments about the Washington Budget Report, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Concord Coalition relies on support from people like you, across the country, who are concerned about our nation's fiscal policy. If you find the Washington Budget Report and our website resources interesting and useful, we invite you to visit http://concordcoalition.org/act/donate and consider making a tax-deductible contribution today in support of The Concord Coalition's work.
You can access Washington Budget Report Archives, going back to January 2007, at http://washingtonbudgetreport.com/archives.php and more recent Reports on the Concord Coalition website at: http://www.concordcoalition.org/publications/budget-report-archive
Track 1- Economic Stimulus:
Track 2 - Completion of '09 Appropriations:
Track 3 - FY 2010 Budget [SEE APPROPRIATIONS TRACKER BELOW]:
Track 4 - Stabilizing the Financial, Housing, and Auto Sectors (Ongoing)
As discussed in recent editions of WBR, one of the key challenges of this year's health care reform is determining how to pay for the enormous costs of covering the uninsured, with estimates as high as $1.2 trillion over 10 years.
This year's congressional budget resolution requires that health care reform legislation must be deficit neutral, i.e., the costs must be fully offset. The President proposed to partially pay for health care reform by reining in Medicare and Medicaid costs, and placing a cap on itemized deductions for high income earners.
The latter proposal -- capping itemized deductions -- has not been well received on Capitol Hill, with some nonprofits arguing it would reduce charitable contributions.
An alternative proposal -- which has been frequently discussed among Members of Congress is capping the tax exclusion of employer provided health benefits. Background: Millions of employees in the U.S. receive health insurance benefits from their employers. Even though health benefits are a form of compensation, the tax code specifically excludes health benefits from taxation. This exclusion will cost the Treasury $155 billion in lost revenues in 2010 alone and more than $2 trillion over 10 years. Taxing only "high-end" health benefits would still bring in nearly a half trillion over 10 years.
Administration officials have been saying the President is opposed to taxing health benefits--and during the presidential campaign he strongly attacked Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for proposing exactly that.
However, this week, following a meeting with the President, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) said taxing health benefits "was discussed. It's on the table."
According to the Washington Post, "White House officials moved quickly to clarify that taxing the health insurance provided by businesses is not Obama's first choice, but aides refused to rule out the possibility."
There are some challenging complexities in fashioning a "fair" cap on the tax exclusion of employer-sponsored health benefits. Earlier this week, the Tax Policy Center hosted a forum to consider ways to fashion a "fair cap." Click on the links below to listen to the forum and read a policy paper.
Earlier this week President Obama met with Senate Democrats working on healthcare legislation. In his prepared remarks, released by the White House, he underscored the importance of controlling health care costs at the same time coverage is expanded:
"I want to just make mention of something that I've talked to many of you privately about. I want to say this publicly. As we move forward on health care reform, it is not sufficient for us simply to add more people to Medicare or Medicaid to increase the rolls, to increase coverage in the absence of cost controls and reform. And let me repeat this principle: If we don't get control over costs, then it is going to be very difficult for us to expand coverage. These two things have to go hand in hand. Another way of putting it is we can't simply put more people into a broken system that doesn't work.
"So we've got to reform the underlying system. And this means promoting best practices, not just the most expensive practices. And one of the things I'm going to be discussing with the health and the finance committees is how can we change incentive structures so that, for example, places like Mayo Clinic in Minnesota are able to provide some of the best health care services in the country at half or sometimes even less of the costs than some other areas where the quality is not as good. What we should be--and by the way, that's not just unique to Mayo. The Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, same thing: top-notch quality, lower costs."
During the meeting with Senators from the Finance and HELP (Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions) Committees, the President also mentioned his interest in a proposal by Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) to beef up the role of MedPAC--the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. MedPAC is an independent congressional agency established in 1997 to advise Congress on payment and other issues affecting Medicare.
The Rockefeller proposal would reestablish MedPAC as an independent executive agency -- similar to the Federal Reserve -- with enhanced authority to establish and implement Medicare reimbursement rules.
According to the Congressional Research Service, with enactment of the FY 2009 Supplemental Appropriations bill, ongoing war costs (budget authority) will reach nearly a trillion dollars:
The Obama Administration has requested $130 billion in war funding for FY 2010, although this is likely to be inadequate given the FY 2009 costs of $149 billion (including the supplemental).
These cost totals are only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Additional costs, not reflected in the totals above include: lifetime health care and disability benefits for returning veterans; substantial costs of replacing military hardware (sometimes called "re-setting" the military); and long-term interest costs on the substantial increases in the public debt due to the war. (This is the first time in U.S. history that taxes were decreased during wartime--necessitating heavy borrowing to pay for the war.)
The House-Senate conference on the FY 2009 Supplemental Appropriations Bill has been delayed due to several developments:
LATEST NEWS: This week, a House Appropriations subcommittee marked up the FY 2010 Commerce-Justice-Science bill, providing $64.4 billion for agencies including the Departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA, and the National Science Foundation. That's an increase of $6.7 billion from FY 2009 funding, but $200 million less than President Obama requested. (See Commerce-Justice-Science below for links to details on the bill.)
Week of June 8th: House Appropriations subcommittees mark-up Homeland Security, Leg. Branch, Interior-Environment, Agriculture. Full Committee marks up Commerce-Justice-State, Homeland Security.
In general--Congressional appropriators face the task of reconciling the President's FY 2010 discretionary funding requests that total $10 billion more than the amount allowed by the FY 2010 congressional budget resolution (see April 30, 2009 WBR). Appropriators will also have to decide whether to accept the $17 billion in program reductions and terminations proposed by the Administration (see May 11, 2009 WBR). Obama Administration's proposed "Terminations, Reductions, and Savings"
Following are LINKS to the latest congressional action, plus a sampling of issues facing the appropriators as reported by Congressional Quarterly. The numbers in parentheses are the FY '09 regular appropriations level in billions (not including stimulus funds), followed by the FY 2010 President's request.
1. AGRICULTURE ($21.6 / $22.9) -- Major issues include the President's proposed 6.5% increase over the current year; overhaul of the food safety system; and the President's proposal to end direct payments to farmers with more than $500,000 in annual sales revenue.
2. COMMERCE-JUSTICE-SCIENCE ($60.1 / $64.6) -- Major issues include the President's proposed 7% increase over the current year; funds to close Gitmo (not provided by the House bill); a major Southwest Border Initiative; readiness of the Census Bureau for the upcoming census; and and NASA's post-space shuttle priorities. House: Chairman's Statement Summary Table Earmark List
3. DEFENSE ($489 / $512) not including $129 billion for war funding and $23 billion for military construction and housing which are funded in a separate bill -- Major issues include termination of the F-22 fighter and the C-17 transport; proposed cuts in missile defense; proposed cuts in the Army's Future Combat Systems; and rising personnel costs.
4. ENERGY WATER ($32.8 / $32.9) -- Major issues include how to continue the big boost in renewable energy research after the stimulus bill's funds run out; the President's proposal to cut funding for the proposed nuclear waste facility at Yucca Mountain, Nev; and the adequacy of funding for water infrastructure projects.
5. FINANCIAL SERVICES ($22.8 / $24.2) -- Major issues include U.S. policy toward Cuba; education vouchers in the District of Columbia; funding to states to upgrade voting equipment; and a proposed OMB program to improve the efficiency of state programs receiving federal funds.
6. HOMELAND SECURITY ($40 / $42.7) -- Major issues include funding efforts to find and deport illegal immigrants; the fence along the Mexican border; whether the proposal to cut the DHS budget starting in 2012 is realistic; and increased funding for road and rail security.
7. INTERIOR-ENVIRONMENT ($27.6 / $32.3) -- Major issues include earmarks for water projects; eliminating a program to clean up diesel engines in California; adequacy of wildfire funding; drilling in federal lands and waters; and new taxes and fees on the oil and gas industry.
8. LABOR-HHS-EDUCATION ($136.4 / $144) -- Major issues include modifications to funding of the Pell Grant program; funding for school construction; increased funding for OSHA; increased funding for NIH after the stimulus funds run out; and the Administration proposal to eliminate abstinence-only education.
9. LEGISLATIVE BRANCH ($4.6 / $5.1) -- Major issues include the Architect of the Capitol's budget; and requests for more staffing at CBO and GAO.
10. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION - VA ($72.9 / $76.3) -- Major issues include advance appropriating FY 2011 funds for VA health care; and funding levels for military construction.
11. STATE-FOREIGN OPERATIONS ($36.6 / $52.0) -- Major issues include the President's proposed 9% increase for the State Dept. and foreign aid programs; funding for Bush's Millennium Challenge Corporation (aimed at countries that adopt democratic and free-market policies); and funding for the U.N. Population Fund (which is strongly opposed by anti-abortion groups).
12. TRANSPORTATION-HUD ($57.8 / $106.6) assuming the need for money from the general fund to supplement the Highway Trust Fund -- Major issues include how to make up the shortfall in gasoline tax revenues flowing into the highway trust fund; funding for a new air traffic control system; increased funding for the Community Development Block Grant program; and increasing loan guarantees through the FHA.
America's Priorities: How the U.S. Government Raises and Spends $3 Trillion Per Year, by Charles S. Konigsberg, Editor, The Concord Coalition's Washington Budget Report.